Welcome, visitor! [ Register | Loginrss  |  tw

Student tuition fees protests

| Education News, Local Authority News, Public Sector News, Teaching News | November 9, 2011

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Student tuition fees protests – live blog” was written by Paul Owen, for guardian.co.uk on Wednesday 9th November 2011 17.33 UTC

5.31pm: Here is an evening summary.

• Thousands of students marched through central London to protest against the government’s cuts to education, increase in tuition fees, and the introduction of private providers into the university sector.There was a very heavy police presence, and very little trouble, with only 20 arrests. Some students criticised the police, saying their approach was over the top. Luci Cunningham, 17, said: “It’s definitely too much. There were police at every corner – we’re not animals.” (See 4.51pm.) Police were also criticised before the march started for briefing that they had the power to use plastic bullets in extreme circumstances, and sending warning letters to known activists. After the march began, the police imposed additional restrictions on the protesters (see 1.27pm).

The most dramatic scenes were at Trafalgar Square, where protesters linked to the Occupy London camp at St Paul’s Cathedral set up a camp of around 28 tents before being removed by police after about half an hour (see 3.27pm). Some of them had planned to stay until the planned strikes of 30 November.

There was a good atmosphere outside St Paul’s, where Billy Bragg and others played music in support of the demonstrators (see 4.29pm).

5.18pm: Joe Meredith emails in response to Sarah Brittan at 5.03pm:

“You will pay it back when you can afford to”… while a student with the same three-year degree, the same job, but well-off parents, can instead save up £27k towards a property deposit. Or do I not understand?

5.15pm: Police have packed up their riot gear at London Wall and most of them have gone now too, the BBC reports.

5.08pm: Robbie Wojciechowski tweets from the Occupy London camp.

Now sitting around in the #occupylsx, slowly protesters that’ve been let out of the kettle are flowing through. Nice mood. #9nov #occupylsx

5.03pm: Sarah Brittan emails in response to Luci Cunningham’s comments at 4.51pm:

Your mother won’t be paying your fees, so it doesn’t matter if she is a single mum! You will pay it back…when you can afford to! The problem is that the students are protesting because they don’t understand the policy!

As mentioned at the start of this blog, from next year fees will triple, allowing English universities to charge up to £9,000 annually, with graduates paying back loans once they are earning £21,000 a year or more.

4.59pm: Shehani Fernando has been speaking to Occupy London’s George Barda. He says he hopes to see occupations of universities soon. “We need students to be with us.”

4.56pm: The containment is thinning out now, Patrick Kingsley reports, with most leaving via a filter cordon on Moorgate. The police have just tweeted that the only road closure still in place is at London Wall.

There’s still around 200 left – many listening to a range of urban music on London Wall. Others who have been involved in previous direct action are worried they’ll be snapped by police photographers as they leave. Police say they’ve got until 5.41pm precisely before a dispersal order kicks in.

Leah Borromaeo, the 32-year-old filmmaker who brought the badminton gear, says she got the idea after hearing the police might use rubber bullets. “I thought I’d bring some of my own rubber projectiles to the protests. It’s an ironic dig. And it gives people something to do.”

4.51pm: My colleague Mustafa Khalili has just been on the phone. He told me he felt some of the protesters had felt frustrated at the huge police presence, which enabled officers to block almost every side road along the route. The police were always in full control of the march, Mustafa said.

Luci Cunningham, 17, an A-level student, criticised the police in an interview with the Press Association:

It’s definitely too much. There were police at every corner – we’re not animals. I think they went a bit over the top, to be honest … It was generally a good atmosphere. We came here because we are going to struggle to pay university fees. My mum is a single mother and my sister is already at university and we are working class. We shouldn’t have to compromise on education. It’s not fair.

Police have made 20 arrests so far. A Scotland Yard spokesman said three were for public order offences, one was for possession of an offensive weapon, three were for going equipped and 12 breaches of the peace. There was also one arrest relating to a suspect covering his face.

4.29pm: Shehani Fernando writes: “Great atmosphere outside St Paul’s with a crowd of a couple of hundred people. Billy Bragg has taken to the stage, Tony Benn is watching and people are loving the music. Unfortunately the sound system is playing up. I met Kaya Mar who hopes to sell this painting to raise money for leftwing movements.”

Patrick Kingsley reports from London Wall:

There are perhaps 800 people contained at the front of the march at the Moorgate / London Wall junction. Protesters can still leave via a filtered cordon on Moorgate, but many are staying. It’s quite a festive mood still – some are dancing, while four people are playing badminton.

Mustafa Khalili sends this video of the police getting a bit more heavy-handed near the Museum of London.

4.12pm: Farah Ahmed emails to say that plainclothes police officers are dragging people out of the crowd. “My friend’s boyfriend was grabbed by someone whilst literally doing nothing.” Alex Peters-Day of the LSE sends this picture, purportedly showing three undercover policemen pulling a protester out of the crowd.

4.09pm: My colleague Hannah Waldram informs me of the interest on Twitter around a photo submitted to our Flickr pool. The image shows a “sodtherich” sticker on the back of a police helmet at the start of the protests. This post on the Londonist blog details how graffiti artist Chu takes plays on “Shoreditch” and the London Underground symbol to get his message across. When asked on Twitter how the sticker managed to get on the back of a police helmet Chu tweeted: “Quick fingers and a bit of good adhesive.”

4.08pm: Lucy Gettings reports that the crowds have been let out at Moorgate, and are no dispersing. She is off to visit Occupy London’s Finsbury Square offshoot.

3.56pm: Shehani Fernando has just been speaking to Billy Bragg at St Paul’s Cathedral. He explains why he is playing in support of the Occupy movement and the protesters today.

3.54pm: Lucy Gettings reports that protesters cannot get out of Moorgate. “Police say they’re waiting for a decision about which way to let us out.”

3.48pm: My colleague Mustafa Khalili sends this video from New Fetter Lane of scuffles with police as the protesters get frustrated with the police tactic of stopping every 10m.

3.43pm: Shiv Malik has just been on the phone from London Wall at the head of the march.

He says the energy of the marchers has picked up, but he is worried about how the thousands of marchers are going to fit into the area around Moorgate, which is the destination of the march.

He says it was hard to tell if there was any link-up with Occupy London at St Paul’s, although the march passed nearby.

He said the police are protesters were not getting on particularly well, with some bottles and sticks thrown by protesters and the police being quite “aggressive”. Apologies for the poor audio quality.

3.32pm: Sky News coverage shows protesters on London Wall throwing a few bits of wood at police, Jessica Shepherd reports.

3.31pm: Lucy Gettings, near the front of the march, reports that the route is lined with riot police with helmets and shields behind multiple barriers. “It’s quite intimidating,” she writes.

3.28pm: Jessica Shepherd, our education correspondent, writes that TV reports show protesters are heading towards St Paul’s, a potential flashpoint for the march because it is the location of the Occupy London camp. The live shots show the main body of protesters is about 25 people deep. Police are letting the protesters continue their march, but are stopping them every few minutes. Police appear to be walking backwards to face the protesters head-on. Police horses are patrolling the sides of the street.

3.27pm: Shehani Fernando sends more video from Trafalgar Square. She writes: “Most of the protesters went fairly peacefully apart from a few at the end who were kicking and screaming. Big coach load of them were taken away and police now gathering the tents. The reasoning for arrest comes across in the video when a female officer says: ‘We believe you have deviated from the route.’”

3.11pm: Shiv Malik sends this from the front of the march:

Protesters were held on New Fetter Lane for 15 minutes causing considerable agitation among the crowd. A number of bottles and placard sticks were thrown. Protesters tried to re-manoeuvre in the narrow lane causing protesters and media at the front to scatter. As the crowd moved into Holborn Circus, plain-clothed officers made an arrest. One officer (presumably an officer) was wearing a windcheater with a British marines emblem on it. More bottles were thrown. The marchers are currently moving down towards City Thameslink station and police have now changed into riot gear.

3.08pm: Alexandra Topping reports the first signs of trouble with apparently minor scuffles between protesters and police. “Some blockages down Fetter Lane, mostly as people try to see what is going on. Police a huge presence and appear very well organised.”

I’ve been speaking to some young men from Liverpool university. They are disappointed at the numbers who have turned up for the march, blaming lack of explicit backing from NUS and “intimidation tactics” from police.

Anthony, 19, studying civil engineering said: “People who were involved in the protests last year were sent letters, police are threatening to use plastic bullets – I think it’s put a lot of people off. But it’s not going to stop us, we are going to keep coming back.”

3.05pm: Shehani Fernando shot this video of the police removing protesters from Trafalgar Square.

3.00pm: Michael White reports that the stand-off at the front of the march over the electricians’ protest has ended, with the demonstrators agreeing to go up Fetter Lane as planned.

Shiv Malik reports: “Getting hairy at the front. Bottle thrown. Cross wants to march a lot of pushing. Another bottle thrown now.”

Trafalgar Square is now clear of all protesters.

2.59pm: Here is a screengrab from BBC News of police clearing the protesters from Trafalgar Square.

2.55pm: The BBC are showing the police removing protesters camped in Trafalgar Square.

2.51pm: Jessica Shepherd, our education correspondent, has been speaking to Michael Chessum, one of the main organisers of the march. He says electricians, who are on a separate march, have been kettled by police by Fleet Street.

This has stopped the students’ demonstration because students are refusing to continue to march unless the electricians are released.

Apart from that, Chessum says, the mood among the protesters is calm. “Police have been stopping us every five minutes to ensure they can control us.”

He says police are being heavy-handed in threatening to arrest protesters who go off the main route of the protest (see 1.27pm).

Lucy Gettings reports that an electrician made an announcement saying that their protest had been kettled by the Territorial Support Group and police dogs and they sent a message of solidarity to the students.

2.48pm: My colleague Shehani Fernando has been speaking to protesters who have pitched tents in Trafalgar Square.

She says they consider themselves part of the Occupy movement, and are affiliated to the protesters camping outside St Paul’s and at Finsbury Square.

They held a general assembly meeting when they pitched their tents and declared their support for the strikes on 30 November. The protesters want to stay until 30 November if they can.

Shehani says the atmosphere is “calm”. There are about 28 tents, holding 50 people, she says.

The police are watching at the other end of the square.

Here she speaks to one of the protesters.

.

2.14pm: Lucy Gettings, who is on the march near the Royal Courts of Justice, reports builders on scaffolding waving “unite the fight” placards. “It’s good to see so much support from non-students; these cuts affect everyone.”

2.11pm: Shehani Fernando has interviewed Cambridge graduate and marcher Xavier, who is having difficulty taking up teacher training.

2.09pm: Here’s a picture of protesters setting up tents at Trafalgar Square.

And another one.

The Metropolitan police have tweeted this:

A small group have broken off the main route, this contravenes Sec 12 of the Public Order Act #nov9 #9nov #ULU

2.06pm: A reader called Drew emails with a claim that the police have been driving dangerously on the Strand while it has been closed:

I’m working on the Strand and was grabbing lunch 40 minutes ago. The Strand is closed with no traffic, so many pedestrians are crossing the road at different points at leisure. I saw a silver BMW police saloon turn on it’s lights/sirens at the Trafalgar Square end and by the time it passed me in the centre of the road it would have easily been doing 60 miles per hour whilst people were crossing everywhere. Very, very dangerous in my opinion, particularly when there was nothing particular going on there at the time and there was no other traffic. If someone had had their headphones on and walked out in front of that police car it would have been a guaranteed fatality. Indicating an attitude of nonchalance when concerning the public (the people the police are supposed to be protecting) as far as I’m concerned. Aren’t there particular rules as to when a police car can break the speed limit?

2.03pm: Shiv Malik reports:

The Guardian had been informed that groups may break away from the march to take direct action. Mini-bands of protesters also seem to be drifting in and around the march route. Here at Fleet Street a small group who appear to have come from St Paul’s has turned up and now headed down the official route the wrong way. All this is going to cause a headache for police who find it very difficult to contain and police so many organically moving and shifting groups over such a large area.

1.55pm: Lucy Gettings and Shehani Fernando are both reporting that after a pause at Trafalgar Square the march has now moved on again, with chanting and drumming, down the Strand.

Shehani interviewed Michael White at Trafalgar Square.

1.44pm: The BBC is reporting that the atmosphere is “jovial” but the big difference to student marches last year is the huge police presence, with police lining the route of the march and walking alongside the demonstrators.

My colleague Shiv Malik has just phoned from Fleet Street, along which the march is due to pass shortly. He told me: “I’ve been to a lot of protests, but I’ve never seen such police preparation before. Most of the rest of Fleet Street has been blocked off and sealed with two dozen police horses, dozens of police vans, a police dog section, and a new resource: giant blue road blockades.” Shiv said there was an “apocalyptic feel because so many roads in the City have been closed down”. He called it “a complete no-car zone“.

Lucy Gettings says the march has stopped near Trafalgar Square; she’s not sure why.

But the BBC is now showing pictures of the protesters putting up tents at Trafalgar Square.

Lucy reports “lots of support from passersby and people in flat windows on Charing Cross Road”.

1.27pm: My colleague Sandra Laville has sent me this update from the Metropolitan police, who have imposed “additional conditions” in today’s march “in order to avoid serious disruption to the life of Londoners and to avoid any potential damage to property or public disorder”.

These conditions are that the protesters should gather for no more than two hours when the main body of the march arrives at London Wall, and that they should restrict their rally to the agreed location of London Wall.

Protesters must also remain on the agreed route and must not enter Bank junction, Princess Street, Threadneedle Street, Lombard Street, Cornhill, Poultry and Mansion House.

We will notify protesters on the route of these additional conditions by way of Twitter updates and text and officers will also use loudspeaker and hand out leaflets and on the route.

Anyone who knowingly fails to comply with these conditions, or who incites others to fail to comply is committing an offence and may be liable to arrest.

1.26pm: We’re getting some good images of posters, placards and stickers to our Flickr group.

Here’s a slideshow of the submissions so far.

1.18pm: Lucy Gettings from the University of Cambridge has been in touch to describe how the march is going so far. She writes:

Great atmosphere, marching with a group who’ve come down from Glasgow and Cambridge University students’ union, singing anti-capitalist songs.

1.17pm: You can get a taste of the atmosphere and hear some of the chants in these Audioboo files.

1.14pm: Becci Heangney took a few moments off from her loud speaker activities to tell Alexandra Topping why she was protesting today. Heangney said:

The government isn’t listening. Everyone here needs to get involved in the strike on November 30, and support Occupy. That is what is going to make the government sit up and listen.

The likelihood of any violence later would “depend on the police”, she added. “Like last year if there is violence it will be started by the police. If you fire rubber bullets at people, kettle them for hours and charge horses at them you are going to get a reaction.”

1.13pm: The Press Association has been speaking to marchers about the police’s comments about being able to use plastic bullets in extreme circumstances.

Beth Atkinson, 27, from London, said:

It is ludicrous. It is antagonistic, it is like they are egging on a fight, which is frankly embarrassing.

John Roberts, a 25-year-old architect from London, said:

I have got friends who haven’t come along because of the threat of rubber bullets.

Sheridan Few, 24, a PhD student at Imperial College London, said:

I think it makes it even more important – we shouldn’t be intimidated.

PA reports chants of “no ifs, no buts, no education cuts” and “David Cameron fuck off back to Eton”. They also shouted: “You can shove your rubber bullets up your arse.”

News and police helicopters hovered overhead and workers came out of their offices to look at the march, which was led by mounted police. Officers on foot carrying batons and riot helmets walked alongside the protesters, PA reports.

1.04pm: Here’s Shehani Fernando’s video of the march passing Bedford Square in central London.

The marchers can be heard chanting for a “general strike”.

1.02pm: Shehani Fernando has interviewed marcher Adam Reeves from Brighton.

12.57pm: The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts is now claiming “tens of thousands” of people will join the march.

The turnout of the demonstration is already big, with well over 15,000 students already ready to march at 12.30pm. Estimates could go to tens of thousands.

12.55pm: Here’s a nice picture of Goldsmith’s and LSE students marching today.

12.45pm: The Metropolitan police has put out a statement saying that rumours and reports that the police will use water cannon are not true.

There is no intention of water cannons being used today #Nov9 #9nov

12.43pm: My colleague Shehani Fernando has been speaking to staff from UCL’s Bartlett School of Architecture about why they are marching.

12.40pm: The BBC is reporting that the student demonstrators have just begun their march from Malet Street in central London.

12.39pm: The Press Association has some details on today’s demonstration by construction workers.

Thousands of construction workers staged a demonstration today in an escalating row over pay and skills in the industry which is set to lead to a strike ballot.

There were some minor skirmishes between some of the workers and police but no arrests were made and organisers said they expected the protest to be peaceful.

Electricians, plumbers and engineers from across the country joined a rally at the site of construction work at Blackfriars Underground station in London, and will later lobby MPs in parliament.

Unions claim that de-skilling and pay cuts are being imposed by a group of construction firms and have been staging protests at building sites across the UK in recent months, including Sellafield in Cumbria, Grangemouth and Ratcliffe power stations and Blackfriars and King’s Cross railway stations in London.

12.38pm: David Willetts, the universities minister, has said allowing police to carry baton rounds at today’s student protests was an “operational matter”, adding that the government was hoping for a peaceful protest.

We want to see peaceful demonstrations, people have a right to demonstrate peacefully for the police, they have operational decisions, so they can obviously after the events a few months back they will be concerned if there is violence from protesters but I very much hope we can avoid all that.

12.37pm: My colleague Alexandra Topping is with the protesters and has been speaking to 17-year-old Yasmin Elgouze.

She says the protests are part of a wider feeling of discontent with capitalism and the belief that things could be better.

“Today is not about violence, it’s about talking,” she says. “We will not succumb to police bully tactics. The vast majority of people are here to exercise their right to peaceful protest, not to fight.”

She says she does not condone violence but can understand why people are angry. “There is a huge amount of rage about what is happening in our country and it is seeping through.”

12.18pm: Dee Doocey, the Liberal Democrat London Assembly policing spokeswoman, has said she will be challenging the Metropolitan Police Commissioner over the “misguided policy” of using plastic bullets as a last resort at the demo.

“Plastic bullets have no role in policing demonstrations in London,” she said. “Their use in Northern Ireland has led to seventeen lives being lost, including eight children. How can anyone believe plastic bullets deliver security when their record is so horrific?”

Meanwhile, Shiv Malik is reporting that police helicopters are circling over Bloomsbury, in central London, where protesters are starting the march.

12.18pm: @danderricott, a student at the University of Lincoln, has tweeted that coaches on the way to the demonstration have been stopped by police to give protesters “warning fliers”.

Shiv Malik wrote in the Guardian today that the police have sent hundreds of letters to anti-cuts activists warning them of the consequences of attending the protest.

11.43am: The Metropolitan police have put up a statement explaining the route and which roads will be closed. They list the route as:

Malet Street, Gower Street, Bloomsbury Street, Shaftesbury Avenue, Charing Cross Road, Duncannon Street, Strand, Fleet Street, Fetter Lane, New Fetter Lane, Holborn Viaduct, Newgate Street, King Edward Street, London Wall.

The police point out that there will be a one-hour rally at London Wall from 3.40pm-4.30pm. “Participants are expected to disperse by 17:30,” they predict, which sounds optimistic to me.

All roads on the route will be closed, with surrounding roads closed when necessary, including London, Southwark, Blackfriars, and Waterloo Bridges.

On the Twitter page of CO11, the Met’s public order unit, the police write: “At present there is no intention to use baton rounds on today’s demonstrations.”

11.34am: My colleague Shehani Fernando has been interviewing Luke Durigan, the education campaigns officer for University College London Union.

Durigan says the march is going to the City, London’s financial centre, rather than parliament, because “we feel that perhaps we need a change here, we need to attack the group where the government’s higher education policy is really coming from today”.

11.31am: We’ve just created a Flickr group to help you show us your pictures of placards and posters for our Reality check. Click on the link to find out more about how the group works and how to submit photos to the pool – hopefully we’ll also be able to feature a selection on the blog.

11.29am: There is currently a “teach out” going on at Russell Square where academics, student activists and Guardian columnists Polly Toynbee and George Monbiot have been invited to talk, my colleague Shiv Malik reports. It has been organised by the Tent City University, which is part of the Occupy encampment at St Paul’s.

One of the organisers Neil Howard said the atmosphere was friendly. “There are a 100 people gathered. We have a series of speakers … The audience are members of the public [around the square]. They are predominately young people.” But he added there were those in their 70s standing in their solidarity.

“People are excited abut also determined. Everyone gathered here realises that this is not a simply fight for education but for the welfare state more broadly. So we’re exited,” Howard said.

11.27am: My colleague Jessica Shepherd points out that Alistair Thompson, a Conservative who unsuccessfully ran for West Bromwich East, has written on ConservativeHome that today’s demonstration is doomed to failure and is “nothing more than a throwback to the 1970s, when union activism last mattered”. There’s a high probability that it will be hijacked by “anti-capitalist loonies, hell-bent on vandalism and destruction”, he writes adding:

The battle over fees was lost more than a decade ago. I say this with a heavy heart, because at the time I was a student officer and took part in yet another ineffective NUS march, calling on Tony Blair’s government to ditch their plan to introduce them … What students need to do is realise that now they are paying for their education, they are consumers in a competitive market and should treat the provision of their education as they would buying a mobile phone.

11.25am: Here are some tweets as people gather for the start of the demonstration.

11.00am: My colleague Paddy Allen has drawn up this dynamic map of the route.

10.58am: I have just been speaking to Michael Chessum of the National Campaign against Fees and Cuts.

He was at the march’s meeting point at the University of London Union on Malet Street, and said he was expecting 10,000 people to join the march, but numbers were “unpredictable”.

I’m looking out the window now – it looks good … We’re expecting dozens of coaches to come in from around the country. Currently the Ulu cafe is packed with Scotland, [people] from Aberdeen, St Andrew’s, Edinburgh, Glasgow. We’re expecting coaches from the north of England, all over the midlands, all over the south-west and -east and all over the south coast.

He talked about why the marchers were opposing the government’s higher education white paper, which would allow private providers to offer degrees for the first time.

The government’s higher education white paper … is essentially, in short, a chaotic, frankly kind of incompetent attempt to introduce a market into higher education and it will end higher education as a public service in the UK, it will introduce for-profit providers, it will mean a market in fees, and it will mean universities such as London Metropolitan University, which is the most working-class university in Britain, with more black and minority ethnic students at it than the whole of the Russell Group, the top 20 university group, combined, may well be forced to close or to privatise. And we may well say formerly public institutions going private and that’s a disaster not only for access but also for the nature of education, education being reduced to a consumer commodity.

10.32am: Over on the Reality check blog, my colleague Jessica Shepherd is examining the messages on the best student placards. Send her your favourites at jessica.shepherd@guardian.co.uk or on Twitter @jessshepherd1. She starts with this one from last year, which says “tax the banks, not the students”.

One of the other inherent messages in this placard is that students are going to be taxed under the new tuition fees system that comes into place in 2012. The government has been careful not to call it a tax, but the demonstrators holding this placard are right: it is in all but name. It is repaid through the income tax system, the amount you repay increases with earnings and you only repay it over a certain amount. However, it does end once you have repaid what you borrowed plus the interest.

10.19am: Here is the planned route of the march.

9.18am: Hello and welcome to the Guardian’s live blog on today’s student protests against tuition fees and cuts in education spending.

An estimated 10,000 students are expected to take part in today’s march in response to government funding cuts and a tripling of maximum tuition fees. They are also opposed to the government’s education white paper, which would allow private providers to offer degrees for the first time.

The students are due to meet at the University of London Union on Malet Street, near Euston station in central London, at midday. Here is a map of the route.

The march is due to head down Gower Street to Trafalgar Square, east along the Strand and Fleet Street, along Holborn Viaduct, before swinging round just north of St Paul’s Cathedral and ending at Moorgate, in the City. The Occupy London camp at St Paul’s is planning to join the demonstration, and has organised a protest concert at St Paul’s featuring Billy Bragg, Chumbawamba and Peggy Seeger.

Here Michael Chessum of the National Campaign against Fees and Cuts explains why the students are marching.

We are determined to block the cuts and privatisation agenda before it becomes a reality, and build a sustainable movement to defeat the government … It does not matter if University College London is aiming to raise application rates from less advantaged socio-economic backgrounds if, just a few miles away, London Metropolitan – the most working class university in the country, with almost as many black students as the whole of the Russell Group – is forced to close or privatise. Meanwhile, fee waivers – a ploy to plug the funding gap caused by the policy of £9,000 fees – will raid bursary pots, pushing more students into scarce part-time work, or poverty.

The demonstration comes exactly a year after thousands of people first took to the streets to protest against the government’s higher education plans. Those protests ended in chaos, with violent clashes between police officers and troublemakers who hijacked the marches, leading to hundreds of arrests.

Police have sent hundreds of letters to anti-cuts activists warning them of the consequences of attending today’s demonstration, my colleague Shiv Malik reports.

In what may also be part of an attempt to discourage students from participating, earlier this week the police brief the press that they were being allowed to use plastic bullets for “extreme” measures during the march.

David Cameron said yesterday he would not criticise the police if they felt it was necessary operationally to use rubber bullets on the student demonstrators.

Chessum accused police chiefs of acting in a “political and cynical” manner in an “attempt to put people off coming to a national demonstration … They have made it more likely trouble will occur.”

Simon Pountain of Scotland Yard said of the plastic bullets, or “baton rounds”: “These are carried by a small number of trained officers and are not held and used by those officers policing the route on Wednesday.”

Around 4,000 officers are expected to be on duty.

Meanwhile a new YouGov poll has shown that the majority of adults have little or no understanding of the new university fees system. From next year fees will triple, allowing English universities to charge up to £9,000 annually, with graduates paying back loans once they are earning £21,000 a year or more. In the poll more than a quarter (26%) thought that students would have to pay their fees upfront; over a third (37%) knew that students would pay nothing upfront.

I’m looking for as many first person stories as possible, so please email me at paul.owen@guardian.co.uk or reach me on Twitter @paultowen and let me know how the march is going for you or send me your photos or video clips.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011

Met police using surveillance system to monitor mobile phones

| Police News, Public Sector News | November 1, 2011

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Met police using surveillance system to monitor mobile phones” was written by Ryan Gallagher and Rajeev Syal, for The Guardian on Sunday 30th October 2011 18.36 UTC

Britain’s largest police force is operating covert surveillance technology that can masquerade as a mobile phone network, transmitting a signal that allows authorities to shut off phones remotely, intercept communications and gather data about thousands of users in a targeted area.

The surveillance system has been procured by the Metropolitan police from Leeds-based company Datong plc, which counts the US Secret Service, the Ministry of Defence and regimes in the Middle East among its customers. Strictly classified under government protocol as “Listed X”, it can emit a signal over an area of up to an estimated 10 sq km, forcing hundreds of mobile phones per minute to release their unique IMSI and IMEI identity codes, which can be used to track a person’s movements in real time.

The disclosure has caused concern among lawyers and privacy groups that large numbers of innocent people could be unwittingly implicated in covert intelligence gathering. The Met has refused to confirm whether the system is used in public order situations, such as during large protests or demonstrations.

Nick Pickles, director of privacy and civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, warned the technology could give police the ability to conduct “blanket and indiscriminate” monitoring: “It raises a number of serious civil liberties concerns and clarification is urgently needed on when and where this technology has been deployed, and what data has been gathered,” he said. “Such invasive surveillance must be tightly regulated, authorised at the highest level and only used in the most serious of investigations. It should be absolutely clear that only data directly relating to targets of investigations is monitored or stored,” he said.

Datong’s website says its products are designed to provide law enforcement, military, security agencies and special forces with the means to “gather early intelligence in order to identify and anticipate threat and illegal activity before it can be deployed”.

The company’s systems, showcased at the DSEi arms fair in east London last month, allow authorities to intercept SMS messages and phone calls by secretly duping mobile phones within range into operating on a false network, where they can be subjected to “intelligent denial of service”. This function is designed to cut off a phone used as a trigger for an explosive device.

A transceiver around the size of a suitcase can be placed in a vehicle or at another static location and operated remotely by officers wirelessly. Datong also offers clandestine portable transceivers with “covered antennae options available”. Datong sells its products to nearly 40 countries around the world, including in Eastern Europe, South America, the Middle East and Asia Pacific. In 2009 it was refused an export licence to ship technology worth £0.8m to an unnamed Asia Pacific country, after the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills judged it could be used to commit human rights abuses.

A document seen by the Guardian shows the Metropolitan police paid £143,455 to Datong for “ICT hardware” in 2008/09. In 2010 the 37-year-old company, which has been publicly listed since October 2005, reported its pro forma revenue in the UK was £3.9m, and noted that “a good position is being established with new law enforcement customer groups”. In February 2011 it was paid £8,373 by Hertfordshire Constabulary according to a transaction report released under freedom of information.

Between 2004 and 2009 Datong won over $1.6 (£1.03m) in contracts with US government agencies, including the Secret Service, Special Operations Command and the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In February 2010 the company won a £750,000 order to supply tracking and location technology to the US defence sector. Official records also show Datong entered into contracts worth more than £500,000 with the Ministry of Defence in 2009.

All covert surveillance is currently regulated under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa), which states that to intercept communications a warrant must be personally authorised by the home secretary and be both necessary and proportionate. The terms of Ripa allow phone calls and SMS messages to be intercepted in the interests of national security, to prevent and detect serious crime, or to safeguard the UK’s economic wellbeing.

Latest figures produced by the government-appointed interception of communications commissioner, Sir Paul Kennedy, show there were 1,682 interception warrants approved by the home secretary in 2010. Public authorities can request other communications data – such as the date, time and location a phone call was made – without the authority of the home secretary. In 2010, 552,550 such requests were made, averaging around 1,500 per day.

Barrister Jonathan Lennon, who specialises in cases involving covert intelligence and Ripa, said the Met’s use of the Datong surveillance system raised significant legislative questions about proportionality and intrusion into privacy.

“How can a device which invades any number of people’s privacy be proportionate?” he said. “There needs to be clarification on whether interception of multiple people’s communications – when you can’t even necessarily identify who the people are – is complaint with the act. It may be another case of the technology racing ahead of the legislation. Because if this technology now allows multiple tracking and intercept to take place at the same time, I would have thought that was not what parliament had in mind when it drafted Ripa.”

Former detective superintendent Bob Helm, who had the authority to sign off Ripa requests for covert surveillance during 31 years of service with Lancashire Constabulary, said: “It’s all very well placed in terms of legislation … when you can and can’t do it. It’s got to be legal and obviously proportionate and justified. If you can’t do that, and the collateral implications far outweigh the evidence you’re going to get, well then you just don’t contemplate it.”

In May the Guardian revealed the Met had purchased software used to map suspects’ digital movements using data gathered from social networking sites, satnav equipment, mobile phones, financial transactions and IP network logs. The force said the software was being tested using “dummy data” to explore how it could be used to examine “police vehicle movements, crime patterns and telephone investigations.”

The Met would not comment on its use of Datong technology or give details of where or when it had been used.

A spokesman said: “The MPS [Metropolitan police service] may employ surveillance technology as part of our continuing efforts to ensure the safety of Londoners and detect criminality. It can be a vital and highly effective investigative tool.

“Although we do not discuss specific technology or tactics, we can re-assure those who live and work in London that any activity we undertake is in compliance with legislation and codes of practice.”

A spokesman for the Home Office said covert surveillance was kept under “constant review” by the chief surveillance commissioner, Sir Christopher Rose, who monitors the conduct of authorities and ensures they are complying with the appropriate legislation.

He added: “Law enforcement agencies are required to act in accordance with the law and with the appropriate levels of authorisation for their activity.”

Datong declined to comment.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011

‘Cash crisis’ threatens future of London fire service.

| Fire Service News, Local Authority News, Public Sector News | October 25, 2011

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “‘Cash crisis’ threatens future of London fire service, says union” was written by Jamie Doward, for The Observer on Saturday 1st October 2011 23.04 UTC

London’s firefighters claim that a cash crisis at the debt-laden private company that owns all their engines and equipment is hampering operations.

AssetCo agreed a deal with its bankers and shareholders that will see it pare down its debts from £120m to £42m. The company said it intends to concentrate on its operations in the United Arab Emirates.

But its restructuring has thrown the future of the London fire service into question. The Fire Brigades Union complains that old and ailing engines have been brought back into frontline service as a result of financial problems at the consortium, which owns the entire fleet of London Fire Brigade engines, as well as 50,000 items of equipment.

The union says it is aware replacement parts and engines are arriving late. “The plight of AssetCo is now starting to affect operational performance throughout the London Fire Brigade,” said the union’s regional organiser, Ben Sprung.

“Many fire stations have operated without their full quota of appliances for several hours at a time. Corners are being cut on repairs and maintenance and old, creaking fire engines have been returned to the frontline – in some cases only to break down moments later.”

AssetCo had hoped to sell off the London operation, but no buyer has materialised. Instead it is likely the London arm of the company will have to be restructured but its debt burden – most of the £42m of the remaining debt – could further threaten its operational capacity if the business is too stretched.

Its problems are acutely embarrassing for the government, which has signalled that it is open to privatising the training of UK firefighters.

A spokesman for the London Fire Brigade said: “Our latest performance figures show that London’s fire engines continue to be maintained and available as normal.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011

Civil service reform ‘too slow for government agenda’

| Civil Service News, Public Sector News | October 25, 2011

Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Civil service reform ‘too slow for government agenda’” was written by Rajeev Syal, for The Guardian on Thursday 22nd September 2011 15.04 UTC

The government’s ambitions for public service reform will fail without sweeping changes across Whitehall, MPs have warned.

Ministers must force through changes to the civil service if they are to implement the “big society”, localism and decentralisation, according to the public administration select committee.

It follows an analysis of possible reforms published in the committee’s report “Change in government: the agenda for leadership”.

The report highlights a lack of specialist expertise, institutional inertia and complacency within Whitehall.

The traditional model of civil service reform through gradual change is not sufficient under the current circumstances, it concludes. The government has proposed rapid decentralisation and a structural reduction of a third in departmental budgets.

Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin, chair of the committee, warned that ministers were at risk of being complacent over the transfer of powers from Whitehall to communities.

“Change needs to be driven from the centre of government and driven by the top management in every department, and lower levels of management must be fully engaged in the objectives and implementation of change.

“This only appears to be happening in very few departments. There is no machinery to ensure lessons are being learned across Whitehall and that corrective is action taken in weaker departments,” he said.

“There is a culture in the civil service which makes change very difficult. Civil service reform is something ministers talk about, but which most civil servants feel does not affect them. They keep their heads down until the latest reform has passed over, and then carry on as before. With the challenges of cuts and downsizing on top of the reforms, that is simply not an option this time.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011

Top civil servants given power to report ministers to PM

| Civil Service News, Public Sector News | October 25, 2011

This article titled “Top civil servants given power to report ministers to PM” was written by Nicholas Watt, chief political correspondent, for The Guardian on Tuesday 18th October 2011 23.56 UTC

Whitehall’s most senior civil servants will be given rights to inform the cabinet secretary and the prime minister if a minister ignores their advice on procedures in their department.

Amid frustration in Downing Street that the permanent secretary at the Ministry of Defence failed to raise her concerns about Liam Fox, the cabinet secretary, Sir Gus O’Donnell, will write to all departments calling for better monitoring.

The tightening of the rules was accepted by Downing Street after O’Donnell found a series of breaches of the ministerial code by Fox, and concluded that Fox had ignored the advice of his permanent secretary, Ursula Brennan, about his links with Adam Werritty.

The new rules will also lead to a greater role for the civil service in contacts between ministers and outsiders after O’Donnell concluded that Fox had allowed a “blurring of lines” between his official and private responsibilities.

The increased remit for the civil service comes amid ministerial concerns that Jeremy Heywood, the Downing Street permanent secretary, who has been named as O’Donnell’s successor, is using a series of changes at No 10 to undermine the role of special advisers. A series of senior political figures have left Downing Street in recent weeks as Heywood builds up a new policy unit that is dominated by civil servants.

O’Donnell was blunt about the way Fox treated Brennan’s advice. He wrote: “The risks of Dr Fox’s association with Mr Werritty were raised with Dr Fox by both his private office and the permanent secretary. Dr Fox took action in respect of business cards but clearly made a judgment that his contact with Mr Werritty should continue. This may have been a reasonable judgment had the contacts been minimal and purely personal and had not involved Mr Werritty’s frequent attendance at meetings in the MoD main building and on overseas visits.

“The damage arose because the frequency, range and extent of these contacts were not regulated as well as they should have been and this was exacerbated by the fact that Dr Fox did not make his department aware of all the various contacts. I also conclude that the links and a lack of clarity of roles means that the donations given to Mr Werritty could be seen as giving rise to the perception of a conflict of interest.”

The main change recommended by O’Donnell will give permanent secretaries the power to go over the heads of their ministers and report concerns to the cabinet secretary and, ultimately, the prime minister.

O’Donnell said: “Permanent secretaries should take responsibility for ensuring departmental procedures are followed, and for raising any concerns with ministers, advising the cabinet secretary and ultimately the prime minister where such concerns are not resolved.”

This will be seen as a significant extension of the powers of No 10 and the Cabinet Office. The prime minister is technically “primus inter pares” – first among equals – in the cabinet whose members are appointed by the Queen and are solely responsible to parliament for their departments.

O’Donnell’s other recommendations, designed to prevent a repeat of the lax way in which Fox met Werritty and other businesspeople overseas without officials, will include:

• Ministers will have to inform their department if they discuss “substantive issues” with external organisations when no officials are present.

• Departments should clarify who is, and who is not, a member of a ministerial visit overseas.

• Officials should accompany ministers to all meetings overseas where official business is discussed.

• Permanent secretaries should discuss with new ministers whether any acquaintances or advisers have contractual relationships with a department or whether they are involved in policy development.

O’Donnell said: “The minister and the permanent secretary should take action as necessary to ensure there can be no actual or perceived conflict of interest in line with the principles of the ministerial code.”

A Downing Street spokesman said: “The MoD permanent secretary has accepted that there should have been much tighter procedures within the department and is taking steps to strengthen them to ensure that the ministerial code is properly adhered to in future.

“The cabinet secretary has now recommended further strengthening of procedures across government. The prime minister accepts the cabinet secretary’s recommendations and the cabinet secretary will write to permanent secretaries setting this out.”

The extension of the remit of civil servants comes amid concerns among ministers at the way in which O’Donnell’s successor has prompted the departure of highly respected special advisers from Downing Street.

Heywood has been restructuring No 10 and beefing up the policy unit with civil servants after Cameron concluded that the difficulties over the health and social care bill highlighted flaws in his operation. The prime minister’s pledge to appoint fewer special advisers before the election meant he failed to create a traditional policy unit in which political advisers monitor individual departments.

One minister said: “Jeremy Heywood is just using this to extend his own power base. Look at the great people who have decided to move on.”

The minister named Tim Chapman, the head of strategic communications, who is leaving to join Google, James O’Shaughnessy, the head of policy, who is expected to move on, and Peter Campbell who oversees Cameron’s preparations for prime minister’s questions.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011

Page 1 of 3123

Submit an article

We welcome and actively encourage article submissions from any professional who works with, or within, the public sector which they feel may be of interest to our readers.

Submit your article here